It is an axiom of practical politics that the power of
government is limited. Realities beyond the control of even the most brilliant
politicians constrain the effective potency of curative and preventative
policies. Even ingenuous states, where the impetuous govern, recognize the
exact contours of such limiting, dynamic constraints. Yet, unlike practiced
states, where the prudent govern, the impetuous believe that limitations
represent mere economic boundaries, overcome through skilled applications of
state power. And the greater the boundaries, the greater justification for an
increased application of that power, no matter the cost. Poverty, disease, internal
strife, territorial integrity, and global conflict can each be overcome at the
right price. Government can right “nearly” every wrong, correct “nearly” every
injustice—while never discovering a wrong or injustice that state power cannot cure.
In the face of such promise, the ingenuous will benevolently appropriate the
resources of generations to come, converting them to their own present benefit.
Such ennobling optimism eventually exhausts vital energies, bequeathing future
generations a shell, incapable of responding to the smallest of difficulties. In
the end, the hubris of the ingenuous state, where the impetuous govern, lies in
the belief that the state can accomplish the miracles of a deity, which more
than justifies the sacrifice of all necessary means to state ends. The sooner
we recognize that the state cannot right “nearly” every wrong, nor correct “nearly”
every injustice, the sooner we will proceed to govern with prudence and aim
towards improving society with care, bequeathing an intact state to progeny that is prepared to meet the most taxing difficulties. The
trouble in practiced and prudent governance, then, is living in hell, while
waiting for heaven. Heaven may come, but it will not come in a crazed,
half-coherent rush to the gates, for heaven will never permit such to enter.
Thank you for that well structured thought that you've provided to mull over.
ReplyDeleteYour prose is as refined as ever.
ReplyDeleteYour message is one I agree with, until the end. You claim (paraphrase) that we need to realize that the government is NOT a church or a god. I claim that it is in fact a religion.
After all, we pay a generous tithe to this church (Taxed approx 33% of GDP.) We are given a code of laws that is just as instructive as any scripture, not to mention it being so complicated that the lay American only scratches the surface with their literacy therein. We build massive temples for the high clergy to meet and perform their legislative ministries. In fact we follow the saviors admonition that 'he who is loved least among you, let him be your public servant.' We send our Army of missionaries to spread American interests abroad. There are no shortage of preachy speeches from politicians. No shortage of promises of salvation from bondage & poverty. No shortage of those who are anxious to lift the downtrodden.
As evidence that this secular government is in fact a religion, you should see some of the art you may find around Washington DC. Notice this piece within the capital: http://www.aoc.gov/capitol-hill/other-paintings-and-murals/apotheosis-washington
Also this: http://www.smithsonianlegacies.si.edu/objectdescription.cfm?ID=66
I claim that the federal government is in fact a religion, and that about the same percentage of it's congregation faithfully follow it's dealings. This saying is true of both politics and religion: You may not take an interest in politics, but politics always take an interest in you.